Declining Shark Populations

Sharks have been swimming in the oceans for more than 400 million years, but in recent decades their populations have declined dramatically. Since the 1970s, some populations by more than 90%.

There are a number of factors that have contributed to this, including overfishing, habitat loss, climate change, and bycatch.

Overfishing is one of the biggest threats facing shark populations. Sharks are highly valued for their meat, fins, and other products, and are targeted by commercial fishing operations around the world. The practice of shark finning, which involves removing the fins and discarding the rest of the shark, has had a particularly devastating impact on shark populations.

Habitat loss is also a significant factor. Many shark species rely on specific habitats, such as coral reefs, seagrass beds, and estuaries for feeding, breeding, and resting. These habitats have been degraded and destroyed by human activities such as coastal development, pollution, and climate change.

Climate change is another major threat. Rising sea temperatures and ocean acidification can have a range of negative impacts on marine ecosystems, including changes in the distribution and abundance of key prey species. This can lead to reduced food availability for sharks and other predators, which can ultimately impact their survival and reproductive success.

Bycatch, the accidental capture of non-target species in fishing gear, is also a major issue. Sharks are often caught as bycatch in a variety of fishing operations, including longlining and gillnetting. This can have a significant impact on shark populations, particularly for species that are already vulnerable due to other threats.

Despite the many challenges, there is still hope for conservation. Efforts to reduce overfishing and regulate the shark fin trade have gained momentum in recent years, and a number of countries have implemented measures to protect shark populations. Additionally, habitat restoration and conservation initiatives can help to create more suitable habitats for sharks and other marine organisms.

By raising awareness of the threats facing sharks and taking action to protect their habitats and reduce overfishing and bycatch, we can work toward securing a brighter future for these iconic and important species.

References:

Dulvy, N. K., et al. "Extinction risk and conservation of the world's sharks and rays." Elife 3 (2014): e00590.

Baum, J. K., et al. "Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic." Science 299.5605 (2003): 389-392.

Worm, B., et al. "Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks." Marine Policy 40 (2013): 194-204.

On Locking Eyes with a Shark

Off the Mornington Peninsula in Victoria, Australia, 43-year-old diver Marshall Yu was approached by a 13-foot great white. He recalls being frozen in place as the behemoth shark, curious, came right for him. 

Through the brief news circulation following the event, much adding expected sensationalism, Yu’s quote stands out. “I didn’t see any aggression,” he said. “I made eye contact with it. (The shark) was pretty cute.” 

It may seem unbelievable that, during an unexpected encounter with such a large predator, one would even recognize the eyes, let alone comment on their beauty. But Yu is not alone in this thought. 

Charles Darwin kept a journal from 1831-1836 chronicling his voyage along the southern hemisphere. In an August 28 entry he speaks on a shark’s eye with undeniable revery:  “Caught by a hook a specimen of genus Squalus: Body “blueish grey”; above, with rather blacker tinge; beneath much white:--Its eye was the most beautiful thing I ever saw.—pupil pale “Verdegris green,” but with a lustre of a jewel, appearing like a Sapphire or Beryl.—Iris pearly edge dark.—Scelerotica pearly.” 

Not every shark species has a pale green pupil around a Sapphire jewel with a pearly sclera. All are different, and in What You Should Know About Sharks, Ocean Ramsey argues this visual difference may affect their overall vision and, by extension, behavior. 

“They all have unique eyes, beautiful and complex, and highly adapted to their specific ecological niche,” Ramsey writes. “Take tiger sharks, for example. Tiger sharks have an amber-yellow eye, like the color you see in the water in low morning and evening light. I can’t prove it exactly, but I think this coloring may provide an advantage. I have observed that tiger sharks like to approach with the sunlight perhaps because most animals avoid looking into the bright sunlight. It’s possible the color of their eyes helps with this approach in this type of low light. However, I’ve also observed that tiger sharks do not have the best eyesight. They don’t seem to notice small objects like many other species do, which might explain why, in addition to their foraging behavior and size, they are one of the species more suspect in adverse interactions in tropical waters.”

So, a shark’s eyes can stand out to a human. But can a human’s eyes stand out to a shark? Is Yu correct in saying he made mutual eye contact with the great white? According to shark experts, also yes. 

While sharks lack the cells to process color vision, they do not lack visual acuity. Human eyes use muscles which control the lens shape and can focus light signals. Though shark lenses do not change shape, they can move forward and backward to focus light. In this sense, many sharks have been documented with a near-equal quality of vision as humans and rely on this strong sense for much of their activities and behavior. 

A 2021 study published by the Journal of Ecotourism considered eye contact between humans and approaching Caribbean reef sharks, examining specifically whether an interruption, such as glancing at a camera or regarding where to retreat, would affect a shark’s behavior. In the field, divers maintained or interrupted eye contact with them, finding that the sharks came significantly closer to the divers when eye contact was interrupted and also reduced their speed. 

“I don’t usually wear a mirrored scuba mask because I get a better response when the sharks can see my eyes,” Ramsey writes. “I also no longer wear mirrored lenses because they reflect light at random which can be eye catching in a bad way depending on my position. I’ve had a shark in the Bahamas rush at the reflection from my mask which I was able to block off at the last moment.”

Many types of sharks ambush their prey, and they can’t sneak-attack something that is aware of them. Thus, they have become evolutionarily wired to make and sense eye contact. 

“The majority of the time, sharks rely on eyesight when hunting and are very sensitive to the eye line of prey and other predators,” Ramsey writes. “It’s for their own safety and success to be able to identify if a potential prey item is aware of their presence, and to identify where the front or eyes of a prey item or another predator are located and looking.” 

Looking a shark in the eye is one of Ramsey’s favorite things to do. Much can be gained by studying how a shark scans its domain and what catches its attention. It allows divers to realize how much detail each species can and cannot see. It helps them understand what can attract unnecessary attention or cause confusion—a safety protocol when interacting with sharks. 

Sharks, in identifying prey, in establishing dominance, are constantly surveilling the blue surroundings for an eyeline. But is this all it is, a simple prey-or-not binary, a checkbox of dominant or submissive? According to the people who are in the water with them every day, there might be something more going on here. 

“Any time I have the experience where I get to lock eyes with a shark it’s almost as if time stops,” says Marina Praet, a safety diver at One Ocean Diving. “It’s as if you are able to communicate without words and peacefully coexist in their home. It truly shifts your perspective on sharks as a whole because you get to see them as more than an animal. You get a glimpse into their personality and have a chance to understand them on a deeper level.”

 

Predator & Prey

Interactions between marine predator and prey species vary at every trophic level in the surrounding ecosystem. Both the stability of the trophic level and the community depend heavily upon these interactions and the total abundance of all predator and prey species in the food chain. As seen across the seven seas, changes in abundances of species in any trophic levels have a great effect on the ecosystem as a whole. Lower trophic levels are composed of mainly detritivores, who are responsible for recycling nutrients in the ecosystem. Higher trophic levels include consumers and apex predators. The trophic level system as a whole works together and is of utmost importance to community structure and balance among all levels. Changes in abundance of higher trophic level species of predators can impact the profusion of their prey at lower trophic levels, causing a cascade of events that takeover the ecosystem and are detrimental to balance in the community. One example of this effect is shown off the Pacific coast in the 1900s where sea otter populations severely diminished due to overhunting for the fur trade. As the populations of sea otters diminished, the abundance of their main prey source, sea urchins, experienced unrestrained growth. The immense populations of sea urchins devastated local kelp and algal supplies, creating colossal issues for primary production, nutrient recycling, habitat degradation, and coastal erosion in this ecosystem. Subtle changes to predator and prey relationships can cause severe effects that resonate throughout the entire marine community. Consequently, understanding these relationships may provide beneficial information about ecosystem heterogeneity which may aid in protecting and conserving biodiversity in these fragile marine systems.

Ecosystem heterogeneity is controlled by various factors, living and nonliving, throughout marine environments. Although the factors controlling ecosystem heterogeneity fluctuate based on varying locations and conditions, studies have revealed patterns in the processes of marine organisms in maintaining the diversity of ecosystem arrangements. Almost all ecosystems have been modified or controlled by a single species and their existence may be traced back to the dependence upon a single organism. Apex predators are prime examples of organisms that aid in preserving heterogeneity. As the top tier of the food chain, apex predators control the balance and efficiency of the trophic levels underneath them. Sharks are amazing apex predators that act as the doctors of the sea, or the white blood cells of the sea, that kill of the sick, weak, dying, and injured so that the strong individuals have more resources and therefore can survive and reproduce. This removal of the weak and sick species in lower trophic levels helps maintain the ecosystem’s overall health. Shark’s ecological role is to maintain strong and healthy ecosystems and not let sickness and disease overrun the population of species in lower trophic levels. Without sharks in our global ecosystems, there would be a detrimental chain reaction felt in every level of the food chain. Lower trophic level organisms would become uncontrolled and consume too much of their prey, leaving an insufficient amount of food for survival and this cascade of events would eventually reach every level of this complex food chain.

Other than ecosystem balance, health, and population control, sharks also maintain proper nutrient recycling in our oceans. We get 70% of oxygen from the ocean, thus ocean health is vital to human health. Sharks are necessary for ecosystem heterogeneity, healthy fish populations, food webs, trophic level systems, whole ecosystems, and the world’s oxygen supply. Therefore, sharks are a necessity and demand protection and preservation in our oceans.